The Missing 50

Half of UK adults don’t give to charity. But why?

Steve Law
Steve Law
Fundraising strategist and charity sector nerd. This tool is based on evidence from 43 sources. Use it freely in workshops — I hope it sparks good conversations.
☕ Buy me a coffee 💼 LinkedIn

🔍 The Investigation

Explore why 50 of these 100 people don’t give to charity

Colour by:
🎯 You’ve built up a solid picture of the evidence — time to put it to work?
Click to explore the evidence above

🔍 How to use The Investigation

🤖 Made with AI — ChatGPT to research and summarise published reports; Claude Code to build the app. There may be mistakes. This is an exploration of what AI tools can create.

This section lets you explore why 50 people from a typical UK audience don’t give to charity. Use it to understand the barriers before planning your response.

The grid

All 100 people are shown at once. Green faces already give. The 50 non-donors don’t — click any of them to explore their story. The colours show which segment or barrier type they belong to (use “Colour by” to change).

Segments

The 50 non-donors fall into 7 distinct audience segments. Selecting a segment highlights those people in the grid so you can see who they are.

Barriers

11 evidence-backed barriers explain what stops people giving. Each is grounded in real research. Selecting a barrier highlights the people most affected.

🤖 The barrier data was synthesised by ChatGPT from 43 published reports, then reviewed and structured for this tool. Individual figures may not match primary sources exactly.
Severity scale
Evidence strength
Propensity to give
Data sources

This tool draws on 43 peer-reviewed studies, government statistics, and sector reports. Each barrier and intervention is linked to its sources — click any source chip to read the key finding.

🤖 This project was built with AI — ChatGPT researched and summarised the reports; Claude Code wrote the app. It’s an honest exploration of what’s possible with AI tools, not a polished product. Use the evidence as a starting point, not a definitive reference.

📋 Research Sources

Every barrier, segment and intervention card in this tool is grounded in published research. Click any title to read the original source.

View source →
The Missing 50 — non-donors
🂠
🂠
🂠
Deck
18
HAND 1 OF 6 · PICK ONE INTERVENTION
🂠
🂠
🂠
Discarded
0

Your Final 100

🎉 New Donors

💰 Impact

—
Illustrative only. Scale: 50 people ≈ 530,000 real non-donor adults (1% of UK adult population). Sources: CAF UK Giving 2025, HMRC Gift Aid Stats 2025, NCVO Almanac 2024.

📖 Key Takeaways

What this simulation reveals about non-donor psychology — and what it means for your strategy.

Did this change how you think about non-donors?

Built on 43 peer-reviewed sources. If it shifted your thinking — or saved your team hours of research — I’d love to stay connected. Follow for more evidence-based fundraising insights, or help keep this tool free.

💼 Follow on LinkedIn ☕ Buy me a coffee

🃏 The Full Deck

All 24 evidence-backed intervention cards — scroll to browse. Each targets a different barrier. No combination converts everyone, but the right mix can move thousands.

Still not convinced…

These people didn’t convert this time. Here’s why, in their own words.

Steve Law
Steve Law

I created The Missing 50 to make non-donor psychology tangible for fundraisers — turning dry statistics into 50 people with real names, real barriers, and real lives. The evidence is solid; the gap is closable. Follow me on LinkedIn for more evidence-based fundraising insights, or buy me a coffee to help keep this tool free.

💼 Follow on LinkedIn ☕ Buy me a coffee